I was invited yesterday by the European Parliamentary Financial Services Forum to participate in a discussion with MEPs (Members of European Parliament), but also US and EU regulators, about “Transatlantic Relations in Financial Services”.
Unfortunately, I was obliged to leave the discussion early to take a train to Rotterdam and The Hague. But yet, the debate was very fruitful in my mind.
What is at stake ?
In the wake of the global financial crisis, an extensive set of reforms was introduced on both sides of the Atlantic to make the financial system more stable and resilient. In the course of 2015, the European Commission launched what we called the “Call for Evidence”, an exercise, aiming at assessing whether the legislative proposals made after the crisis in the area of financial services were fulfilling their objectives (by the way, on December 1, a progress report by the European Commission provided an update on its follow-up). Similarly, President Trump’s executive order on Core Principles for regulating the US financial system (February 2017) called for an appropriate evaluation of the existing financial regulation …
The first issue relates to Basel.
As the GHOS could announce soon an accord on the finalization of the Basel III framework, we talked about global standards and international level playing field.
Basel discussions were not very transparent, and to be honest, nobody knows what there is precisely in the accord. The ability of the Banking industry to price risk properly cannot be assessed at this stage. And the impact of the finalized package is uncertain too (originally, the G20 stated that this impact should be not significant …).
Last but not least, the way it will be implemented on both sides of the Atlantic is still unclear, especially as far as market activities are concerned.
All this put together creates really huge uncertainties.
The second issue brings to Brexit.
One third of London based wholesale banking is related to EU27 based clients. People who try to lobby the EU27 will be unable to deal with its financing needs are just joking. But it’s right to say that with the UK leaving the boat, there is now a challenge for EU27, consisting in the deepening of the Economic and Monetary Union.
In this context, Europe (the “EU27” one) has to deal with fundamental questions :
- how to find the right degree of risk sharing (what EU Southern countries want to make it simple) and risk reduction (EU Northern countries to simply again) ; that’s the purpose of CRR/CRD discussions ;
- how to attract big players (I didn’t resist during the discussion the temptation to remind to my US and UK colleagues how Paris is a beautiful city …), while keeping “at the same time” big European players in the game … because at the end of the day, when there is a crisis, money goes back to home markets.
That’s why, speaking of Transatlantic Relations, we come back to our own European responsibilities. Because in real life, when you have problems with others, especially when they are your friends, that’s easier to start by looking at yourself !
Iconography : A Chart of the Atlantic Ocean, London, 1775, 49.2 x 63.5 cm.
After working as an international banker for emerging countries, Laurent Lascols became global head of country risk / sovereign risk (from 2008 to 2013) then global director of public affairs (from 2014 to 2019) for Societe Generale. In 2021, he founded Aristote, an advisory firm and training organization dedicated to environmental economics, sustainable finance and impact finance.